# Gemini 2.0 Pro vs GLM-5.3

> GLM-5.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-glm-5-3
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-5.3 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GLM-5.3 leads 46.1 to 22.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 65.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 90.9% for GLM-5.3.
- GLM-5.3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-5.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 54.8 |
| Rank | 173 | 26 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $1.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $4.40 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187)
- GLM-5.3: 59.5 (#14)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-5.3 |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | — | 69% |
| FrontierCode | — | 40.1% |
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| CursorBench | — | 42.6% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1622 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 30.2% |
| SciCode | — | 59% |
| WeirdML | — | 75.4% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1496 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,317 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- GLM-5.3: 36.4 (#38)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-5.3 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 56.6% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 8,164 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198)
- GLM-5.3: 46.1 (#46)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-5.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 155.61 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 74.2% |
| CritPt | — | 19.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 21% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1489 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 33% |
| DTBench | — | 87.7% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| LMCA | — | 55.5% |
| Bench to the Future 3 | — | 0.15 |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100)
- GLM-5.3: 62.3 (#33)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-5.3 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 68.8% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 29.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 91.1% |
| ProofBench | — | 49% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1489 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167)
- GLM-5.3: 58.3 (#37)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-5.3 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 90.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 41% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1516 |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- GLM-5.3: 55.7 (#28)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-5.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1457 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1528 |
| LMArena French | — | 1499 |
| LMArena German | — | 1499 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1453 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1472 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1463 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1460 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59)
- GLM-5.3: 77.5 (#23)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-5.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1477 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292)
- GLM-5.3: 45.4 (#41)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-5.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1482 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165)
- GLM-5.3: 75.7 (#6)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-5.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1471 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1457 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 2075 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1472 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than GLM-5.3?

GLM-5.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or GLM-5.3 better for coding?

GLM-5.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.5 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and GLM-5.3 share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5.3 has 42.