# Gemini 2.0 Pro vs GLM-4.7-Flash

> Gemini 2.0 Pro and GLM-4.7-Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.6 vs 38.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-glm-4-7-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 5 categories and GLM-4.7-Flash in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where GLM-4.7-Flash leads 40.9 to 29.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 65.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 60.5% for GLM-4.7-Flash.
- GLM-4.7-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 38.4 |
| Rank | 171 | 175 |
| Context | — | 200K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.06 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182)
- GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.0 (#133)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1383 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194)
- GLM-4.7-Flash: 20.2 (#224)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1356 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101)
- GLM-4.7-Flash: 34.4 (#159)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 58.3% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1354 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156)
- GLM-4.7-Flash: 35.4 (#177)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 60.5% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 9.3% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1357 |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- GLM-4.7-Flash: 46.8 (#152)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1331 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1403 |
| LMArena French | — | 1332 |
| LMArena German | — | 1336 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1284 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1333 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1351 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57)
- GLM-4.7-Flash: 70.3 (#162)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1327 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287)
- GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.9 (#143)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1345 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164)
- GLM-4.7-Flash: 47.7 (#206)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1351 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1297 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1125 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1342 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than GLM-4.7-Flash?

Gemini 2.0 Pro and GLM-4.7-Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.6 vs 38.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or GLM-4.7-Flash better for coding?

GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 37.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and GLM-4.7-Flash share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.7-Flash has 21.