# Gemini 2.0 Pro vs GLM-4.5

> GLM-4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-glm-4-5
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 3 categories and GLM-4.5 in 4 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where GLM-4.5 leads 38.2 to 29.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Fiction.LiveBench: 41.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 58.3% for GLM-4.5.
- GLM-4.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 41.4 |
| Rank | 171 | 125 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.60 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182)
- GLM-4.5: 41.1 (#121)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 54.2% |
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| WeirdML | — | 40.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1434 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 344.82 |
| AlgoTune | — | 1.52 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194)
- GLM-4.5: 27.7 (#99)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 57.9% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1430 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101)
- GLM-4.5: 36.3 (#119)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1427 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156)
- GLM-4.5: 35.5 (#172)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Confabulations | 18.4% | 11.3% |
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 8.3% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1433 |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- GLM-4.5: 53.0 (#74)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1417 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1465 |
| LMArena French | — | 1423 |
| LMArena German | — | 1406 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1416 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1382 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1414 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1454 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57)
- GLM-4.5: 74.3 (#100)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1405 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287)
- GLM-4.5: 38.2 (#196)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | 58.3% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1413 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164)
- GLM-4.5: 57.7 (#121)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1430 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1395 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 73.4% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1343 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1415 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than GLM-4.5?

GLM-4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or GLM-4.5 better for coding?

GLM-4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.1 versus 37.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and GLM-4.5 share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.5 has 27.