# Gemini 2.0 Pro vs GLM-4.5-Air

> Gemini 2.0 Pro and GLM-4.5-Air score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.1 vs 38.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-glm-4-5-air
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in long context, where GLM-4.5-Air leads 41.6 to 29.2.
- GLM-4.5-Air has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 38.9 |
| Rank | 173 | 177 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.20 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.10 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187)
- GLM-4.5-Air: 33.3 (#259)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| GSO | — | 2.9% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1397 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198)
- GLM-4.5-Air: 24.1 (#166)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 43% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1379 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 59.2 |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100)
- GLM-4.5-Air: 36.2 (#170)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 39.1% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1396 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167)
- GLM-4.5-Air: 35.0 (#191)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 8.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 76.2% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 9.3% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 59.4% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1370 |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- GLM-4.5-Air: 49.1 (#135)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1366 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1426 |
| LMArena French | — | 1399 |
| LMArena German | — | 1377 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1348 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1308 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1373 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1386 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59)
- GLM-4.5-Air: 69.6 (#171)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| IFEval | — | 81.2% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1354 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292)
- GLM-4.5-Air: 41.6 (#135)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1366 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165)
- GLM-4.5-Air: 55.9 (#139)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1384 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1343 |
| WildBench | — | 78.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1371 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than GLM-4.5-Air?

Gemini 2.0 Pro and GLM-4.5-Air score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.1 vs 38.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or GLM-4.5-Air better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 33.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and GLM-4.5-Air share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.5-Air has 27.