# Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Gemma 7B

> Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-gemma-7b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 6 categories and Gemma 7B in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 52.7 to 27.1.
- Gemma 7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Google |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 30.0 |
| Rank | 173 | 299 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187)
- Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1048 |
| HumanEval+ | — | 28.7% |
| MBPP+ | — | 43.4% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198)
- Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 111.99 |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1042 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 48.7% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55.1% |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.2% |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
| PIQA | — | 81.2% |
| WinoGrande | — | 79% |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100)
- Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1066 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 46.4% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167)
- Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1001 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 78.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 83.2% |
| MMLU | — | 66.1% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 78.6% |
| TriviaQA | — | 72.3% |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 999 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1035 |
| LMArena French | — | 1025 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 993 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59)
- Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1017 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292)
- Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1022 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165)
- Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1056 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1024 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 963 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Gemma 7B?

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Gemma 7B better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Gemma 7B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 7B has 27.