# Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Gemma 3n E4b IT

> Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-gemma-3n-e4b-it
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in long context, where Gemma 3n E4b IT leads 38.7 to 29.2.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Google |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 37.3 |
| Rank | 173 | 206 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1268 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 31.5% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1284 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1251 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1246 |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1285 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1309 |
| LMArena French | — | 1330 |
| LMArena German | — | 1311 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1272 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1259 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1288 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1305 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1255 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1276 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1306 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1287 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1276 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Gemma 3n E4b IT?

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Gemma 3n E4b IT better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (37.8 vs 37.0); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Gemma 3n E4b IT share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18.