# Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Gemma 3 27B

> Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-gemma-3-27b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 6 categories and Gemma 3 27B in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 37.4 to 22.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Aider Polyglot: 35.6% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 4.9% for Gemma 3 27B.
- Gemma 3 27B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Google |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 30.5 |
| Rank | 171 | 277 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.08 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.16 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182)
- Gemma 3 27B: 22.1 (#329)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | 4.9% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | 39.9% |
| SciCode | — | 21.2% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1322 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- Gemma 3 27B: 24.9 (#105)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 29.5% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194)
- Gemma 3 27B: 16.3 (#297)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | 43.8% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | 51.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 130.04 |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | 50% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 40.4% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1340 |
| DTBench | — | 52.5% |
| LMCA | — | 12.3% |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101)
- Gemma 3 27B: 24.4 (#261)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | 55.4% |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | 74% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 22.5% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1312 |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156)
- Gemma 3 27B: 25.4 (#256)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 47.7% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | 40.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 7.4% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1303 |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- Gemma 3 27B: 32.0 (#94)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1165 |
| GeoBench | — | 52% |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- Gemma 3 27B: 47.0 (#150)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1334 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1347 |
| LMArena French | — | 1368 |
| LMArena German | — | 1362 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1287 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1308 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1349 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1348 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57)
- Gemma 3 27B: 70.8 (#155)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | 74.9% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1321 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287)
- Gemma 3 27B: 27.6 (#288)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | 33.3% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1333 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164)
- Gemma 3 27B: 52.7 (#161)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | 34.6% |
| LMArena Text | — | 1358 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1346 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 79.9% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1266 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1344 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Gemma 3 27B?

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Gemma 3 27B better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.4 versus 22.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Gemma 3 27B share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3 27B has 43.