# Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Gemma 3 12B

> Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-gemma-3-12b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 6 categories and Gemma 3 12B in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 37.1 to 21.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 65.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 39.5% for Gemma 3 12B.
- Gemma 3 12B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3 12B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Google |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 31.8 |
| Rank | 171 | 255 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.05 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.15 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182)
- Gemma 3 12B: 31.2 (#276)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3 12B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| SciCode | — | 17.4% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1281 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- Gemma 3 12B: 25.3 (#101)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3 12B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 30.4% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194)
- Gemma 3 12B: 15.2 (#307)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3 12B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 123.49 |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1309 |
| DTBench | — | 48.8% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| LMCA | — | 4.5% |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101)
- Gemma 3 12B: 21.0 (#273)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3 12B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 16.7% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1307 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156)
- Gemma 3 12B: 26.5 (#250)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3 12B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 39.5% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 4.4% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1248 |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- Gemma 3 12B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3 12B |
|---|---|---|
| MindCube | — | 46.7% |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- Gemma 3 12B: 45.9 (#160)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3 12B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1318 |
| LMArena German | — | 1370 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1335 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57)
- Gemma 3 12B: 68.8 (#179)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3 12B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1299 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287)
- Gemma 3 12B: 40.0 (#157)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3 12B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1317 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164)
- Gemma 3 12B: 47.7 (#205)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3 12B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1334 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1331 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1126 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1334 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Gemma 3 12B?

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Gemma 3 12B better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.4 versus 31.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Gemma 3 12B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3 12B has 24.