# Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Gemma 2 9B

> Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-gemma-2-9b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 6 categories and Gemma 2 9B in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 39.7 to 9.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 83.5% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 21% for Gemma 2 9B.
- Gemma 2 9B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 2 9B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Google |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 25.9 |
| Rank | 173 | 341 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187)
- Gemma 2 9B: 29.4 (#304)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 2 9B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | 22.5% |
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 34.7% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1173 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 40.6% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198)
- Gemma 2 9B: 15.9 (#309)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 2 9B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | 15.2% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | 36.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 119.83 |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | 28.7% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1171 |
| PIQA | — | 83.7% |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100)
- Gemma 2 9B: 9.9 (#318)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 2 9B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | 19.8% |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | 21% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 0.6% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1183 |
| GSM8K | — | 84.9% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167)
- Gemma 2 9B: 9.7 (#305)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 2 9B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 27.5% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1147 |
| BoolQ | — | 85.7% |
| MMLU | — | 72.1% |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- Gemma 2 9B: 36.6 (#238)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 2 9B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1188 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1185 |
| LMArena French | — | 1190 |
| LMArena German | — | 1186 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1144 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1137 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1200 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1200 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59)
- Gemma 2 9B: 57.6 (#269)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 2 9B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | 52.6% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1178 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292)
- Gemma 2 9B: 36.3 (#233)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 2 9B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1197 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165)
- Gemma 2 9B: 32.1 (#281)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 2 9B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | 25.5% |
| LMArena Text | — | 1207 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1206 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 841 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1193 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Gemma 2 9B?

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Gemma 2 9B better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Gemma 2 9B share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2 9B has 35.