# Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Gemma 1.1 2b IT

> Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-gemma-1-1-2b-it
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 52.7 to 25.1.
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Google |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 29.3 |
| Rank | 173 | 313 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187)
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1034 |
| HumanEval+ | — | 17.7% |
| MBPP+ | — | 23.3% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198)
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1005 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100)
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1047 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167)
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 970 |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 988 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1012 |
| LMArena German | — | 944 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 899 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 990 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59)
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 992 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292)
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1003 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165)
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1022 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 998 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 959 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Gemma 1.1 2b IT?

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Gemma 1.1 2b IT better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Gemma 1.1 2b IT share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16.