# Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Gemini 2.5 Pro

> Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-gemini-2-5-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 2 categories and Gemini 2.5 Pro in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where Gemini 2.5 Pro leads 59.8 to 29.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Fiction.LiveBench: 41.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 91.7% for Gemini 2.5 Pro.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Google |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 45.0 |
| Rank | 173 | 75 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $1.25 |
| Output $/M | — | $10 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187)
- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 42.4 (#101)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | 83.1% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | 85.9% |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 57.6% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 53.6% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1227 |
| SciCode | — | 42.8% |
| GSO | — | 3.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 54% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1452 |
| CadEval | — | 64% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.52 |
| AlgoTune | — | 1.51 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 29.2 (#88)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 32.6% |
| GDPval | — | 23.3% |
| Remote Labor Index | — | 0.8% |
| TheAgentCompany | — | 30.3% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 13.7% |
| DeepResearch Bench | — | 42.8% |
| BALROG | — | 43.3% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1142 |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 55.4% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 573.64 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198)
- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 28.8 (#99)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | 5.6% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | 89.8% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | 79.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 145.32 |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | 82.3% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 4.9% |
| SimpleBench | — | 62.4% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 70.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 41% |
| CritPt | — | 2% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1455 |
| DTBench | — | 82.4% |
| LMCA | — | 34.8% |
| ForecastBench | — | 61.3 |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100)
- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 32.5 (#213)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | 90.2% |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | 95.9% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 24.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 0% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 84.7% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 41.6% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1450 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 14.1% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 4.2% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167)
- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 56.0 (#46)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 85.3% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | 10.6% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 21.6% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 86.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 7% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 74.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1452 |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 45.2 (#18)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1263 |
| GeoBench | — | 86% |
| VPCT | — | 48% |
| LMArena Document | — | 1421 |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 44.7% |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 55.3 (#31)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1451 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1507 |
| LMArena French | — | 1472 |
| LMArena German | — | 1487 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1461 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1434 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1461 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1473 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59)
- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 75.0 (#75)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | 80.6% |
| IFEval | — | 84% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1437 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292)
- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 59.8 (#5)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | 91.7% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1449 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165)
- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 63.7 (#62)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | 67.8% |
| LMArena Text | — | 1458 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1454 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 83.8% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1421 |
| WildBench | — | 85.7% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1453 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Gemini 2.5 Pro?

Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Gemini 2.5 Pro better for coding?

Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Gemini 2.5 Pro share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.5 Pro has 78.