# Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview

> Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.7 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-flash-vs-qwen3-5-max-preview
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 Max Preview in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads 66.1 to 49.8.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 34.8 | 44.7 |
| Rank | 223 | 72 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.2 (#308)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 43.4 (#79)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1351 | 1488 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | — |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.0 (#85)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#308)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 29.6 (#81)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | 1483 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| DTBench | 63.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | — |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.1 (#127)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 37.3 (#99)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1351 | 1473 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#207)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.1 (#104)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1340 | 1489 |
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |
| MMLU | 79.7% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 35.9 (#74)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | — |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.6 (#144)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.4 (#21)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | 1465 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | 1534 |
| LMArena French | 1390 | 1483 |
| LMArena German | 1354 | 1487 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1293 | 1497 |
| LMArena Korean | 1314 | 1438 |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | 1472 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | 1470 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.6 (#91)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.2 (#28)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | 1467 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#198)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#44)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | 1477 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.8 (#184)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.1 (#39)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | 1471 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | 1464 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | 1478 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?

Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.7 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?

Qwen3.5 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 28.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.