# Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Qwen3 32B

> Qwen3 32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-flash-vs-qwen3-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 20

## Summary

- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3 32B in 7 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen3 32B leads 37.3 to 28.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 37.8% for Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and 54.9% for Qwen3 32B.
- Qwen3 32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 34.8 | 38.8 |
| Rank | 223 | 166 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.70 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.80 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.2 (#308)
- Qwen3 32B: 37.3 (#184)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | 40% |
| LMArena Coding | 1351 | 1358 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| SciCode | — | 35.4% |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.0 (#85)
- Qwen3 32B: 32.3 (#58)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 48.7% |
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#308)
- Qwen3 32B: 19.6 (#233)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | 54.9% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | 1335 |
| DTBench | 63.2% | 67.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | 138.51 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| LMCA | — | 17.3% |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.1 (#127)
- Qwen3 32B: 37.9 (#89)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | 66.9% |
| LMArena Math | 1351 | 1399 |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#207)
- Qwen3 32B: 40.0 (#112)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | 65.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1340 | 1362 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.9% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |
| MMLU | 79.7% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 35.9 (#74)
- Qwen3 32B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | — |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.6 (#144)
- Qwen3 32B: 45.8 (#162)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | 1317 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | 1357 |
| LMArena German | 1354 | 1341 |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | 1311 |
| LMArena French | 1390 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1293 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1314 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.6 (#91)
- Qwen3 32B: 69.1 (#174)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | 1305 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#198)
- Qwen3 32B: 43.7 (#83)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | 74.2% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | 1327 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.8 (#184)
- Qwen3 32B: 53.1 (#158)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | 1297 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | 1331 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than Qwen3 32B?

Qwen3 32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or Qwen3 32B better for coding?

Qwen3 32B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.3 versus 28.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Qwen3 32B share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 32B has 26.