# Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

> Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.8 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-flash-vs-qwen2-5-7b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct in 1 category; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads 36.1 to 11.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 57.8% for Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and 2.5% for Qwen2.5 7B Instruct.
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 34.8 | 28.6 |
| Rank | 223 | 314 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.17 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.70 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.2 (#308)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 35.9 (#204)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | 37.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | 46.1% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | — |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1351 | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.0 (#85)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 23.5 (#117)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |
| BALROG | — | 7.8% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#308)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 14.3 (#317)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 63.2% | 47.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | 118.44 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| LMCA | — | 6.4% |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.1 (#127)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 11.8 (#300)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | 2.5% |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | 29.4% |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1351 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#207)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 17.0 (#281)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | 35.5% |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | 53.9% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | 34.1% |
| MMLU | 79.7% | 72.9% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1340 | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 35.9 (#74)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | — |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.6 (#144)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | — |
| LMArena French | 1390 | — |
| LMArena German | 1354 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1293 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1314 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.6 (#91)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 63.4 (#226)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 84.1% | 74.1% |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#198)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.8 (#184)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 48.8 (#194)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| WildBench | 80% | 73.1% |
| LMArena Text | 1354 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.8 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or Qwen2.5 7B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.9 versus 28.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has 15.