# Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

> Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.8 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-flash-vs-qwen2-5-72b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 33

## Summary

- They share 33 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads 36.1 to 18.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 57.8% for Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and 8.1% for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct.
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 34.8 | 31.5 |
| Rank | 223 | 259 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $1.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $5.60 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.2 (#308)
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 32.8 (#256)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 25.8% | 16% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | 45.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1351 | 1293 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | 55.9% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.0 (#85)
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 22.0 (#124)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | 5.7% |
| BALROG | — | 16.2% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 35.8% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#308)
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 21.4 (#197)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | 1271 |
| DTBench | 63.2% | 62.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | 129.01 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| LMCA | — | 13.4% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 79.8% |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.5 |
| HellaSwag | — | 84.8% |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |
| PIQA | — | 82.6% |
| WinoGrande | — | 82.3% |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.1 (#127)
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 18.1 (#281)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | 8.1% |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | 33% |
| LMArena Math | 1351 | 1283 |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | 63.2% |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#207)
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 26.9 (#247)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | 49.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | 63.1% |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | 19.1% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | 42.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1340 | 1245 |
| MMLU | 79.7% | 85.3% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 94.5% |
| TriviaQA | — | 71.9% |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 35.9 (#74)
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | — |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.6 (#144)
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 41.2 (#208)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | 1252 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | 1272 |
| LMArena French | 1390 | 1279 |
| LMArena German | 1354 | 1234 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1293 | 1180 |
| LMArena Korean | 1314 | 1188 |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | 1264 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | 1255 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.6 (#91)
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 65.7 (#216)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 84.1% | 80.6% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | 1254 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#198)
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 38.9 (#183)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | 1282 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.8 (#184)
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 46.9 (#210)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | 1269 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | 1221 |
| WildBench | 80% | 80.2% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | 1272 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.8 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or Qwen2.5 72B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.8 versus 28.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct share?

33 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has 43.