# Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Phi-4

> Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.8 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-flash-vs-phi-4
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 33

## Summary

- They share 33 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 6 categories and Phi-4 in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads 36.1 to 19.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 57.8% for Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and 13.8% for Phi-4.
- Phi-4 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 34.8 | 30.9 |
| Rank | 223 | 269 |
| Context | — | 128K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.07 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.14 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.2 (#308)
- Phi-4: 33.8 (#237)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | 45.5% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | 30.7% |
| LMArena Coding | 1351 | 1231 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | 55.4% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | — |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.0 (#85)
- Phi-4: 22.6 (#120)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 28.8% |
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |
| BALROG | — | 11.6% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#308)
- Phi-4: 17.0 (#287)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | 47.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | 1220 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | 45.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | 130.43 |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | 41.6% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 1% |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| DTBench | 63.2% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.1 (#127)
- Phi-4: 19.6 (#279)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | 13.8% |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | 42% |
| LMArena Math | 1351 | 1246 |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | 64.9% |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#207)
- Phi-4: 32.5 (#204)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | 56.1% |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | 29.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1340 | 1203 |
| MMLU | 79.7% | 84.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 3.7% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 35.9 (#74)
- Phi-4: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | — |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.6 (#144)
- Phi-4: 37.4 (#232)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | 1197 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | 1211 |
| LMArena French | 1390 | 1223 |
| LMArena German | 1354 | 1222 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1293 | 1158 |
| LMArena Korean | 1314 | 1151 |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | 1209 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | 1234 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.6 (#91)
- Phi-4: 60.6 (#246)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | 58.4% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | 1201 |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#198)
- Phi-4: 36.9 (#221)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | 1217 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.8 (#184)
- Phi-4: 40.7 (#239)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | 1217 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | 1182 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | 62.6% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | 1206 |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | 25.6% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than Phi-4?

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.8 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or Phi-4 better for coding?

Phi-4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.8 versus 28.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Phi-4 share?

33 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 has 37.