# Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Olmo 7b Instruct

> Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.1 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-flash-vs-olmo-7b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 4 categories and Olmo 7b Instruct in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads 74.4 to 49.0.
- Olmo 7b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 35.1 | 30.3 |
| Rank | 228 | 295 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.4 (#315)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1350 | 1016 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | — |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.1 (#92)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#318)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | 993 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| DTBench | 63.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | — |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 37.9 (#146)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1352 | 1018 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#213)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | — |
| MMLU | 79.7% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.5 (#79)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | — |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.4 (#149)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | 977 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | 1014 |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | 947 |
| LMArena French | 1391 | — |
| LMArena German | 1353 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1294 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1313 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.4 (#97)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | 978 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#203)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1344 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.5 (#190)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | 1032 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | 990 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | 1007 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than Olmo 7b Instruct?

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.1 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or Olmo 7b Instruct better for coding?

Olmo 7b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 29.6 versus 28.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Olmo 7b Instruct share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.