# Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Muse Spark 1.1

> Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-flash-vs-muse-spark-1-1
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 21

## Summary

- They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.1 in 10 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.1 leads 45.9 to 15.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 63.2% for Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and 94.4% for Muse Spark 1.1.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 34.8 | 49.9 |
| Rank | 223 | 43 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $1.25 |
| Output $/M | — | $4.25 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.2 (#308)
- Muse Spark 1.1: 50.8 (#38)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1351 | 1497 |
| DeepSWE | — | 53.3% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1542 |
| SciCode | — | 58.8% |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.0 (#85)
- Muse Spark 1.1: 33.9 (#45)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 40.5% |
| GBAEval | — | 7.9% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 15% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 6,520 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#308)
- Muse Spark 1.1: 45.9 (#41)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | 1486 |
| DTBench | 63.2% | 94.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | 154.32 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 84.9% |
| CritPt | — | 15.1% |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| LMCA | — | 49.9% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 52.5% |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.1 (#127)
- Muse Spark 1.1: 44.0 (#67)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1351 | 1477 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 39% |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#207)
- Muse Spark 1.1: 52.8 (#55)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1340 | 1480 |
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 57.8% |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |
| MMLU | 79.7% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 35.9 (#74)
- Muse Spark 1.1: 41.9 (#28)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | 1292 |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |
| LMArena Document | — | 1465 |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.6 (#144)
- Muse Spark 1.1: 56.8 (#16)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | 1471 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | 1518 |
| LMArena French | 1390 | 1494 |
| LMArena German | 1354 | 1466 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1293 | 1445 |
| LMArena Korean | 1314 | 1459 |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | 1482 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | 1471 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.6 (#91)
- Muse Spark 1.1: 76.8 (#36)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | 1457 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#198)
- Muse Spark 1.1: 44.8 (#55)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | 1463 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.8 (#184)
- Muse Spark 1.1: 73.6 (#11)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | 1479 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | 1440 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | 1927 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | 1484 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1260 |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than Muse Spark 1.1?

Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or Muse Spark 1.1 better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.8 versus 28.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Muse Spark 1.1 share?

21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.1 has 36.