# Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Mistral 7B

> Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.8 to 22.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-flash-vs-mistral-7b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 24

## Summary

- They share 24 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 8 categories and Mistral 7B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads 36.1 to 7.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 82.2% for Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and 3.7% for Mistral 7B.
- Mistral 7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 34.8 | 22.9 |
| Rank | 223 | 346 |
| Context | — | 8K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.25 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.25 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.2 (#308)
- Mistral 7B: 25.9 (#321)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | 19.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1351 | 1082 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | 27.3% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | — |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 36% |
| MBPP+ | — | 42.1% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.0 (#85)
- Mistral 7B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#308)
- Mistral 7B: 12.6 (#331)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | 1067 |
| DTBench | 63.2% | 42.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | 111.97 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 47.1% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 56.1% |
| HellaSwag | — | 81% |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |
| PIQA | — | 83% |
| WinoGrande | — | 75.3% |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.1 (#127)
- Mistral 7B: 7.6 (#319)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | 0.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1351 | 1085 |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | 3.7% |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 54.4% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#207)
- Mistral 7B: 7.3 (#306)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | 15.2% |
| LMArena Expert | 1340 | 1036 |
| MMLU | 79.7% | 62.5% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 78.6% |
| BoolQ | — | 87.4% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 79.8% |
| TriviaQA | — | 75.2% |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 35.9 (#74)
- Mistral 7B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | — |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.6 (#144)
- Mistral 7B: 26.0 (#278)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | 1012 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | 1009 |
| LMArena French | 1390 | 1036 |
| LMArena German | 1354 | 987 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1293 | 878 |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | 1018 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | 1026 |
| LMArena Korean | 1314 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.6 (#91)
- Mistral 7B: 54.5 (#275)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | 1060 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#198)
- Mistral 7B: 32.2 (#266)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | 1060 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.8 (#184)
- Mistral 7B: 30.9 (#281)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | 1090 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | 1068 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | 1062 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than Mistral 7B?

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.8 to 22.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or Mistral 7B better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 28.2 versus 25.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Mistral 7B share?

24 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and Mistral 7B has 37.