# Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs MiniMax-M2.7

> MiniMax-M2.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-flash-vs-minimax-m2-7
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 19

## Summary

- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 3 categories and MiniMax-M2.7 in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiniMax-M2.7 leads 41.8 to 28.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is WeirdML: 25.8% for Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and 37% for MiniMax-M2.7.
- MiniMax-M2.7 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 35.1 | 37.7 |
| Rank | 228 | 196 |
| Context | — | 205K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.4 (#315)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 41.8 (#120)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 25.8% | 37% |
| LMArena Coding | 1350 | 1454 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1398 |
| SciCode | — | 47% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 599.25 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.1 (#92)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 25.1 (#111)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 45.1% |
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |
| ExploitBench | — | 13.3% |
| GBAEval | — | 0% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#318)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 19.7 (#253)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | 1422 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | 145.85 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 24.7% |
| CritPt | — | 0.6% |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 39.3% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| DTBench | 63.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 37.9 (#146)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 25.9 (#263)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1352 | 1420 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 3% |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#213)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 37.7 (#152)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | 1444 |
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 12.9% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |
| MMLU | 79.7% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.5 (#79)
- MiniMax-M2.7: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | — |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.4 (#149)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 50.3 (#123)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | 1382 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | 1441 |
| LMArena French | 1391 | 1421 |
| LMArena German | 1353 | 1398 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1294 | 1262 |
| LMArena Korean | 1313 | 1313 |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | 1383 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | 1403 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.4 (#97)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 74.1 (#103)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | 1405 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#203)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 43.3 (#99)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1344 | 1419 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.5 (#190)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 58.9 (#112)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | 1405 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | 1354 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | 1412 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than MiniMax-M2.7?

MiniMax-M2.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or MiniMax-M2.7 better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 28.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and MiniMax-M2.7 share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.7 has 30.