# Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs MiniMax-M2.5

> MiniMax-M2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-flash-vs-minimax-m2-5
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 22

## Summary

- They share 22 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 4 categories and MiniMax-M2.5 in 5 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiniMax-M2.5 leads 47.9 to 28.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SWE-bench Verified (bash only): 13.5% for Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and 75.8% for MiniMax-M2.5.
- MiniMax-M2.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiniMax-M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 34.8 | 38.1 |
| Rank | 223 | 181 |
| Context | — | 205K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.2 (#308)
- MiniMax-M2.5: 47.9 (#53)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiniMax-M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | 75.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1351 | 1380 |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1386 |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | — | 68.3% |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 618.17 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.0 (#85)
- MiniMax-M2.5: 30.2 (#70)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiniMax-M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 42.7% |
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | -23.16 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#308)
- MiniMax-M2.5: 17.6 (#281)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiniMax-M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | 4.9% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | 55.2% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | 1372 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | 146.68 |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 16.8% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 63.7% |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| DTBench | 63.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.1 (#127)
- MiniMax-M2.5: 25.8 (#242)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiniMax-M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1351 | 1378 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 4% |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#207)
- MiniMax-M2.5: 38.6 (#132)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiniMax-M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1340 | 1378 |
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 9.1% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |
| MMLU | 79.7% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 35.9 (#74)
- MiniMax-M2.5: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiniMax-M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | — |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.6 (#144)
- MiniMax-M2.5: 47.3 (#147)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiniMax-M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | 1338 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | 1392 |
| LMArena French | 1390 | 1363 |
| LMArena German | 1354 | 1361 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1293 | 1169 |
| LMArena Korean | 1314 | 1232 |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | 1359 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | 1354 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.6 (#91)
- MiniMax-M2.5: 71.7 (#143)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiniMax-M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | 1353 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#198)
- MiniMax-M2.5: 37.4 (#211)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiniMax-M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | 1367 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |
| CL-bench | — | 11.4% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 6.3% |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.8 (#184)
- MiniMax-M2.5: 54.1 (#149)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiniMax-M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | 1359 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | 1331 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | 1361 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | 1364 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than MiniMax-M2.5?

MiniMax-M2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or MiniMax-M2.5 better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.9 versus 28.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and MiniMax-M2.5 share?

22 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.5 has 33.