# Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

> MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-flash-vs-mimo-v2-6-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 10 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 43.1 to 15.2.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 35.1 | 50.3 |
| Rank | 228 | 49 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.43 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.87 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.4 (#315)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1350 | 1534 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1629 |
| SciCode | — | 60.9% |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,158 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.1 (#92)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 59.5% |
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#318)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | 1512 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | — |
| CritPt | — | 26.6% |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| DTBench | 63.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | — |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 37.9 (#146)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1352 | 1494 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 70% |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#213)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | 1543 |
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |
| MMLU | 79.7% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.5 (#79)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | 1264 |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.4 (#149)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | 1529 |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | 1480 |
| LMArena French | 1391 | — |
| LMArena German | 1353 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1294 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1313 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.4 (#97)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | 1493 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#203)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1344 | 1501 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.5 (#190)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | 1492 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | 1468 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | 1464 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 28.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19.