# Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Llama 4 Scout

> Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.8 to 27.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-flash-vs-llama-4-scout
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 35

## Summary

- They share 35 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 10 categories and Llama 4 Scout in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads 36.1 to 18.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 57.8% for Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and 7.8% for Llama 4 Scout.
- Llama 4 Scout has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 34.8 | 27.4 |
| Rank | 223 | 323 |
| Context | — | 128K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.10 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.2 (#308)
- Llama 4 Scout: 19.9 (#334)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | 9.1% |
| LMArena Coding | 1351 | 1286 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | 43.1% |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | — |
| SciCode | — | 17% |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.0 (#85)
- Llama 4 Scout: 24.4 (#109)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 28.1% |
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#308)
- Llama 4 Scout: 9.2 (#339)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | 0% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | 36.9% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | 1266 |
| DTBench | 63.2% | 57.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | 129.64 |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 0.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| LMCA | — | 12% |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.5 |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.1 (#127)
- Llama 4 Scout: 18.4 (#280)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | 7.8% |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | 37.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1351 | 1286 |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | 62.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | 0% |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#207)
- Llama 4 Scout: 31.8 (#208)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | 51.8% |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | 74.2% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | 50.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1340 | 1236 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 7.7% |
| MMLU | 79.7% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 35.9 (#74)
- Llama 4 Scout: 31.6 (#98)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | 1118 |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 34.2% |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.6 (#144)
- Llama 4 Scout: 41.3 (#207)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | 1253 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | 1256 |
| LMArena French | 1390 | 1283 |
| LMArena German | 1354 | 1274 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1293 | 1209 |
| LMArena Korean | 1314 | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | 1263 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | 1277 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.6 (#91)
- Llama 4 Scout: 66.0 (#212)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 84.1% | 81.8% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | 1248 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#198)
- Llama 4 Scout: 27.5 (#289)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | 36% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | 1265 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.8 (#184)
- Llama 4 Scout: 37.1 (#256)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | 1279 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | 1249 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | 783 |
| WildBench | 80% | 78% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | 1281 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than Llama 4 Scout?

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.8 to 27.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or Llama 4 Scout better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 28.2 versus 19.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Llama 4 Scout share?

35 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and Llama 4 Scout has 43.