# Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Llama 4 Maverick

> Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.8 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-flash-vs-llama-4-maverick
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 44

## Summary

- They share 44 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 9 categories and Llama 4 Maverick in 1 category; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads 36.1 to 24.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 57.8% for Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and 20.6% for Llama 4 Maverick.
- Llama 4 Maverick has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 34.8 | 30.6 |
| Rank | 223 | 276 |
| Context | — | 128K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.19 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.65 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.2 (#308)
- Llama 4 Maverick: 26.3 (#318)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | 21% |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | 15.6% |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | 24.5% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | 49.7% |
| LMArena Coding | 1351 | 1302 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | 61.4% |
| SciCode | — | 33.1% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 172.97 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.0 (#85)
- Llama 4 Maverick: 27.9 (#86)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 37.3% |
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#308)
- Llama 4 Maverick: 10.1 (#337)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | 0% |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | 27.7% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | 55.9% |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | 0.6% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | 1281 |
| DTBench | 63.2% | 61.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | 132.2 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 8% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 4.4% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| LMCA | — | 15.9% |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.5 |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.1 (#127)
- Llama 4 Maverick: 24.6 (#256)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | 20.6% |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | 42.2% |
| LMArena Math | 1351 | 1299 |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | 73% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | 0.7% |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#207)
- Llama 4 Maverick: 33.3 (#196)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | 67% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | 5.7% |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | 81% |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | 22.6% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | 65% |
| LMArena Expert | 1340 | 1259 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 8.2% |
| MMLU | 79.7% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 35.9 (#74)
- Llama 4 Maverick: 30.9 (#100)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | 1141 |
| GeoBench | 77% | 52% |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 31.8% |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.6 (#144)
- Llama 4 Maverick: 42.4 (#190)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | 1269 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | 1277 |
| LMArena French | 1390 | 1258 |
| LMArena German | 1354 | 1291 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1293 | 1207 |
| LMArena Korean | 1314 | 1203 |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | 1286 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | 1293 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.6 (#91)
- Llama 4 Maverick: 71.9 (#140)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 84.1% | 90.8% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | 1267 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#198)
- Llama 4 Maverick: 31.4 (#274)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | 46.2% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | 1280 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.8 (#184)
- Llama 4 Maverick: 39.0 (#247)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | 1287 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | 1266 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | 62% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | 860 |
| WildBench | 80% | 80% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | 1289 |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than Llama 4 Maverick?

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.8 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or Llama 4 Maverick better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 28.2 versus 26.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Llama 4 Maverick share?

44 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and Llama 4 Maverick has 54.