# Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Llama 3-8B

> Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.1 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-flash-vs-llama-3-8b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 25

## Summary

- They share 25 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 7 categories and Llama 3-8B in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads 37.9 to 8.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 82.2% for Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and 6.1% for Llama 3-8B.
- Llama 3-8B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 3-8B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 35.1 | 25.5 |
| Rank | 228 | 344 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.4 (#315)
- Llama 3-8B: 31.0 (#289)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 3-8B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | 31.9% |
| LMArena Coding | 1350 | 1152 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | 36.9% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | — |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 56.7% |
| MBPP+ | — | 54.8% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.1 (#92)
- Llama 3-8B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 3-8B |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#318)
- Llama 3-8B: 14.3 (#326)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 3-8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | 1133 |
| DTBench | 63.2% | 43.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | 116.45 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 57.3% |
| ForecastBench | — | 58.6 |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | — | 75.7% |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 37.9 (#146)
- Llama 3-8B: 8.8 (#323)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 3-8B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | 1.9% |
| LMArena Math | 1352 | 1151 |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | 6.1% |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#213)
- Llama 3-8B: 7.8 (#308)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 3-8B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | 26.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | 1113 |
| MMLU | 79.7% | 68.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 82.8% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 82.6% |
| TriviaQA | — | 67.7% |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.5 (#79)
- Llama 3-8B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 3-8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | — |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.4 (#149)
- Llama 3-8B: 30.8 (#261)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 3-8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | 1098 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | 1076 |
| LMArena French | 1391 | 1159 |
| LMArena German | 1353 | 1104 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1294 | 967 |
| LMArena Korean | 1313 | 1004 |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | 1109 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | 1173 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.4 (#97)
- Llama 3-8B: 58.4 (#260)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 3-8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | 1127 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#203)
- Llama 3-8B: 34.2 (#251)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 3-8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1344 | 1128 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.5 (#190)
- Llama 3-8B: 37.5 (#256)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 3-8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | 1166 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | 1150 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | 1152 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than Llama 3-8B?

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.1 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or Llama 3-8B better for coding?

Llama 3-8B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.0 versus 28.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Llama 3-8B share?

25 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3-8B has 34.