# Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Llama 3-70B

> Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.8 to 28.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-flash-vs-llama-3-70b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 26

## Summary

- They share 26 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 7 categories and Llama 3-70B in 2 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads 36.1 to 12.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 82.2% for Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and 22.6% for Llama 3-70B.
- Llama 3-70B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 34.8 | 28.5 |
| Rank | 223 | 317 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.2 (#308)
- Llama 3-70B: 35.3 (#215)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | 43.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1351 | 1206 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | 54.5% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | — |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 72% |
| MBPP+ | — | 69% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.0 (#85)
- Llama 3-70B: 20.9 (#132)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |
| Cybench | — | 5% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#308)
- Llama 3-70B: 17.4 (#284)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | 35.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | 1195 |
| DTBench | 63.2% | 54.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | 122.91 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.1 |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | — | 83.5% |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.1 (#127)
- Llama 3-70B: 12.0 (#299)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | 4.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1351 | 1218 |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | 22.6% |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#207)
- Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#272)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | 40.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1340 | 1149 |
| MMLU | 79.7% | 79.3% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 35.9 (#74)
- Llama 3-70B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | — |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.6 (#144)
- Llama 3-70B: 33.8 (#246)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | 1142 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | 1114 |
| LMArena French | 1390 | 1231 |
| LMArena German | 1354 | 1169 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1293 | 1017 |
| LMArena Korean | 1314 | 1017 |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | 1159 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | 1241 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.6 (#91)
- Llama 3-70B: 62.8 (#233)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | 1194 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#198)
- Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#235)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | 1174 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.8 (#184)
- Llama 3-70B: 43.0 (#225)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | 1221 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | 1210 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | 1223 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than Llama 3-70B?

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.8 to 28.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or Llama 3-70B better for coding?

Llama 3-70B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.3 versus 28.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Llama 3-70B share?

26 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3-70B has 31.