# Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Llama 2-13B

> Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.8 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-flash-vs-llama-2-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 20

## Summary

- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 7 categories and Llama 2-13B in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads 74.6 to 53.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 63.2% for Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and 42.2% for Llama 2-13B.
- Llama 2-13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 34.8 | 29.1 |
| Rank | 223 | 304 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.2 (#308)
- Llama 2-13B: 30.4 (#287)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1351 | 1062 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | — |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.0 (#85)
- Llama 2-13B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#308)
- Llama 2-13B: 12.3 (#333)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | 1051 |
| DTBench | 63.2% | 42.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | 105.8 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 58.2% |
| HellaSwag | — | 80.7% |
| LAMBADA | — | 76.5% |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |
| PIQA | — | 80.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 72.8% |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.1 (#127)
- Llama 2-13B: 28.7 (#226)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1351 | 1065 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 36.9% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#207)
- Llama 2-13B: 27.5 (#244)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1340 | 1030 |
| MMLU | 79.7% | 55.6% |
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 60.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 82.4% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 57% |
| TriviaQA | — | 79.6% |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 35.9 (#74)
- Llama 2-13B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | — |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |
| ScienceQA | — | 55.8% |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.6 (#144)
- Llama 2-13B: 26.7 (#274)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | 1024 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | 1001 |
| LMArena French | 1390 | 1043 |
| LMArena German | 1354 | 1009 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1293 | 894 |
| LMArena Korean | 1314 | 953 |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | 1055 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | 1086 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.6 (#91)
- Llama 2-13B: 53.5 (#282)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | 1046 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#198)
- Llama 2-13B: 32.3 (#264)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | 1064 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.8 (#184)
- Llama 2-13B: 30.0 (#284)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | 1085 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | 1047 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | 1050 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than Llama 2-13B?

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.8 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or Llama 2-13B better for coding?

Llama 2-13B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.4 versus 28.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Llama 2-13B share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-13B has 32.