# Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Kimi K2.6

> Kimi K2.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.7 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-flash-vs-kimi-k2-6
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 25

## Summary

- They share 25 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 2 categories and Kimi K2.6 in 8 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Kimi K2.6 leads 40.5 to 15.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 57.8% for Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and 96.1% for Kimi K2.6.
- Kimi K2.6 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 35.1 | 47.7 |
| Rank | 228 | 60 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.95 |
| Output $/M | — | $4 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.4 (#315)
- Kimi K2.6: 50.7 (#43)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 25.8% | 55.9% |
| LMArena Coding | 1350 | 1488 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 76.7% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1509 |
| SciCode | — | 53.5% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,093 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.1 (#92)
- Kimi K2.6: 21.9 (#137)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 4.6% |
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |
| ExploitBench | — | 18.4% |
| GBAEval | — | 0.9% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 12% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 6,205 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#318)
- Kimi K2.6: 40.5 (#55)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | 1470 |
| DTBench | 63.2% | 90.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | 151.05 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 87.2% |
| CritPt | — | 8% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 26% |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| EBR-Bench | — | 2.4% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 18% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| LMCA | — | 37.3% |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 37.9 (#146)
- Kimi K2.6: 57.0 (#41)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | 96.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1352 | 1475 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | 39% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 57.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 25.6% |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 72.9% |
| ProofBench | — | 16% |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 14.6% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#213)
- Kimi K2.6: 54.0 (#54)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | 90.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | 1491 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 34.9% |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.8% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |
| MMLU | 79.7% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.5 (#79)
- Kimi K2.6: 31.6 (#103)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | 1283 |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 3.9% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 21.7% |
| LMArena Document | — | 1451 |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.4 (#149)
- Kimi K2.6: 54.9 (#37)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | 1446 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | 1521 |
| LMArena French | 1391 | 1471 |
| LMArena German | 1353 | 1450 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1294 | 1443 |
| LMArena Korean | 1313 | 1427 |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | 1446 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | 1464 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.4 (#97)
- Kimi K2.6: 76.3 (#43)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | 1451 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#203)
- Kimi K2.6: 44.9 (#52)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1344 | 1468 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.5 (#190)
- Kimi K2.6: 68.5 (#26)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | 1434 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | 1725 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | 1453 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1202 |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than Kimi K2.6?

Kimi K2.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.7 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or Kimi K2.6 better for coding?

Kimi K2.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.7 versus 28.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Kimi K2.6 share?

25 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.6 has 51.