# Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent

> Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-flash-vs-grok-4-20-multi-agent
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 18

## Summary

- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent in 9 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads 43.9 to 15.2.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 35.1 | 46.2 |
| Rank | 228 | 65 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $1.25 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.50 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.4 (#315)
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.0 (#92)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1350 | 1457 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | — |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.1 (#92)
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |
| LMArena Search | — | 1204 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#318)
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.9 (#48)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | 1448 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 89.6% |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| DTBench | 63.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | — |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 37.9 (#146)
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.4 (#104)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1352 | 1442 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#213)
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.4 (#119)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | 1445 |
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |
| MMLU | 79.7% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.5 (#79)
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.5 (#48)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | 1259 |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.4 (#149)
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 54.4 (#43)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | 1440 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | 1475 |
| LMArena French | 1391 | 1466 |
| LMArena German | 1353 | 1456 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1294 | 1405 |
| LMArena Korean | 1313 | 1416 |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | 1457 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | 1447 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.4 (#97)
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 74.8 (#84)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | 1420 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#203)
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.7 (#88)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1344 | 1431 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.5 (#190)
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 64.0 (#59)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | 1450 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | 1436 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | 1452 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent better for coding?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 28.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has 20.