# Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Granite 3.0 2b Instruct

> Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.1 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-flash-vs-granite-3-0-2b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 7 categories and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads 74.4 to 53.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Instruct: 45.9% for Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and 20.5% for Granite 3.0 2b Instruct.
- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 35.1 | 30.8 |
| Rank | 228 | 286 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.4 (#315)
- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 28.3 (#316)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | 20.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1350 | 1090 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | — |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.1 (#92)
- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#318)
- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 20.5 (#235)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | 1073 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| DTBench | 63.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | — |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 37.9 (#146)
- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.2 (#217)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1352 | 1117 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#213)
- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.0 (#241)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | 1064 |
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |
| MMLU | 79.7% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.5 (#79)
- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | — |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.4 (#149)
- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.0 (#278)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | 1033 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | 1070 |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | 1045 |
| LMArena French | 1391 | — |
| LMArena German | 1353 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1294 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1313 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.4 (#97)
- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 53.9 (#284)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | 1056 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#203)
- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.5 (#268)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1344 | 1070 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.5 (#190)
- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.6 (#292)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | 1080 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | 1046 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | 1053 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than Granite 3.0 2b Instruct?

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.1 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or Granite 3.0 2b Instruct better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (28.4 vs 28.3); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has 13.