# Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs GPT-4.1 mini

> Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.8 to 33.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-flash-vs-gpt-4-1-mini
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 38

## Summary

- They share 38 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 7 categories and GPT-4.1 mini in 3 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads 36.1 to 23.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Fiction.LiveBench: 61.1% for Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and 44.4% for GPT-4.1 mini.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 34.8 | 33.5 |
| Rank | 223 | 232 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.60 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.2 (#308)
- GPT-4.1 mini: 30.4 (#286)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | 23.9% |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | 32.4% |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | 37.6% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | 48.9% |
| LMArena Coding | 1351 | 1367 |
| CadEval | 30% | 16% |
| SciCode | — | 40.4% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.0 (#85)
- GPT-4.1 mini: 33.0 (#52)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 50.5% |
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#308)
- GPT-4.1 mini: 10.9 (#335)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | 0% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | 48.6% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | 1349 |
| DTBench | 63.2% | 68.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | 135.01 |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 3.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 7% |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 7% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| LMCA | — | 21.1% |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.1 (#127)
- GPT-4.1 mini: 23.1 (#264)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | 44.7% |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | 49.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1351 | 1343 |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | 87.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | 4.5% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 6.7% |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#207)
- GPT-4.1 mini: 34.7 (#183)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | 65.8% |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | 78.3% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | 61.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1340 | 1338 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 12.7% |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| MMLU | 79.7% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 35.9 (#74)
- GPT-4.1 mini: 35.2 (#77)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | 1181 |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.6 (#144)
- GPT-4.1 mini: 45.9 (#161)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | 1318 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | 1329 |
| LMArena French | 1390 | 1357 |
| LMArena German | 1354 | 1349 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1293 | 1291 |
| LMArena Korean | 1314 | 1298 |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | 1324 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | 1319 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.6 (#91)
- GPT-4.1 mini: 73.9 (#113)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 84.1% | 90.4% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | 1332 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#198)
- GPT-4.1 mini: 31.8 (#270)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | 44.4% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | 1344 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.8 (#184)
- GPT-4.1 mini: 48.8 (#193)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | 1341 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | 1300 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | 1147 |
| WildBench | 80% | 83.8% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | 1354 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than GPT-4.1 mini?

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.8 to 33.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or GPT-4.1 mini better for coding?

GPT-4.1 mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.4 versus 28.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and GPT-4.1 mini share?

38 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and GPT-4.1 mini has 47.