# Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Gemma 3 4B

> Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.1 to 28.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-flash-vs-gemma-3-4b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 18

## Summary

- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 7 categories and Gemma 3 4B in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads 37.9 to 16.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 57.8% for Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and 7.5% for Gemma 3 4B.
- Gemma 3 4B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Google |
| Noometry Index | 35.1 | 28.1 |
| Rank | 228 | 326 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.04 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.08 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.4 (#315)
- Gemma 3 4B: 35.9 (#215)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1350 | 1230 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | — |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.1 (#92)
- Gemma 3 4B: 20.9 (#142)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 19.6% |
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#318)
- Gemma 3 4B: 13.2 (#335)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | 25.2% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | 1253 |
| DTBench | 63.2% | 50.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | 116.02 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| LMCA | — | 2.8% |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 37.9 (#146)
- Gemma 3 4B: 16.8 (#292)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | 7.5% |
| LMArena Math | 1352 | 1239 |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#213)
- Gemma 3 4B: 11.8 (#299)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | 23.2% |
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | 1223 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 6.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |
| MMLU | 79.7% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.5 (#79)
- Gemma 3 4B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | — |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.4 (#149)
- Gemma 3 4B: 42.5 (#194)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | 1273 |
| LMArena German | 1353 | 1281 |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | 1294 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | — |
| LMArena French | 1391 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1294 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1313 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.4 (#97)
- Gemma 3 4B: 65.2 (#225)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | 1239 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#203)
- Gemma 3 4B: 38.7 (#194)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1344 | 1273 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.5 (#190)
- Gemma 3 4B: 42.0 (#239)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | 1291 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | 1271 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | 1068 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | 1255 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than Gemma 3 4B?

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.1 to 28.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or Gemma 3 4B better for coding?

Gemma 3 4B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.9 versus 28.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Gemma 3 4B share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3 4B has 22.