# Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Gemma 3 27B

> Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.8 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-flash-vs-gemma-3-27b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 37

## Summary

- They share 37 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 8 categories and Gemma 3 27B in 2 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads 36.1 to 24.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 57.8% for Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and 22.5% for Gemma 3 27B.
- Gemma 3 27B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Google |
| Noometry Index | 34.8 | 30.5 |
| Rank | 223 | 277 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.08 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.16 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.2 (#308)
- Gemma 3 27B: 22.1 (#329)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | 4.9% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | 39.9% |
| LMArena Coding | 1351 | 1322 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| SciCode | — | 21.2% |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.0 (#85)
- Gemma 3 27B: 24.9 (#105)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 29.5% |
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#308)
- Gemma 3 27B: 16.3 (#297)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | 40.4% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | 43.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | 1340 |
| DTBench | 63.2% | 52.5% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | 51.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | 130.04 |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | 50% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| LMCA | — | 12.3% |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.1 (#127)
- Gemma 3 27B: 24.4 (#261)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | 22.5% |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | 55.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1351 | 1312 |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | 74% |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#207)
- Gemma 3 27B: 25.4 (#256)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | 47.7% |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | 40.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1340 | 1303 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 7.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |
| MMLU | 79.7% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 35.9 (#74)
- Gemma 3 27B: 32.0 (#94)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | 1165 |
| GeoBench | 77% | 52% |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.6 (#144)
- Gemma 3 27B: 47.0 (#150)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | 1334 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | 1347 |
| LMArena French | 1390 | 1368 |
| LMArena German | 1354 | 1362 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1293 | 1287 |
| LMArena Korean | 1314 | 1308 |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | 1349 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | 1348 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.6 (#91)
- Gemma 3 27B: 70.8 (#155)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | 74.9% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | 1321 |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#198)
- Gemma 3 27B: 27.6 (#288)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | 33.3% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | 1333 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.8 (#184)
- Gemma 3 27B: 52.7 (#161)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | 1358 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | 1346 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | 79.9% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | 1266 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | 1344 |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | 34.6% |
| WildBench | 80% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than Gemma 3 27B?

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.8 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or Gemma 3 27B better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 28.2 versus 22.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Gemma 3 27B share?

37 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3 27B has 43.