# Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Gemini 2.0 Pro

> Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-flash-vs-gemini-2-0-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 1 category and Gemini 2.0 Pro in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 37.4 to 28.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Fiction.LiveBench: 61.1% for Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and 41.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Google |
| Noometry Index | 34.8 | 38.6 |
| Rank | 223 | 171 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.2 (#308)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | 35.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | 63.5% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1351 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.0 (#85)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#308)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | 0.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | 60.1% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | 68% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | 135.06 |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | 65.1% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | — |
| DTBench | 63.2% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.1 (#127)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | 71% |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | 83.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1351 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#207)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | 65.7% |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | 18.4% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1340 | — |
| MMLU | 79.7% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 35.9 (#74)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | — |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.6 (#144)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | — |
| LMArena French | 1390 | — |
| LMArena German | 1354 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1293 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1314 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.6 (#91)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | 83.4% |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#198)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | 41.7% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.8 (#184)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | 44.9% |
| LMArena Text | 1354 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than Gemini 2.0 Pro?

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or Gemini 2.0 Pro better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.4 versus 28.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Gemini 2.0 Pro share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14.