# Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Qwen1.5-110B

> Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.8 to 34.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-flash-lite-vs-qwen1-5-110b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 18

## Summary

- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen1.5-110B in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads 51.7 to 38.0.
- Qwen1.5-110B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.8 | 34.2 |
| Rank | 194 | 234 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.9 (#185)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 33.0 (#264)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1322 | 1184 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 35% |
| LiveBench Coding | 47.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 44.4% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 22.0 (#210)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 22.7 (#189)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1324 | 1168 |
| ForecastBench | 57.1 | 57.7 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 50.1% | — |
| DTBench | 52.5% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 65.5% | — |
| LiveBench | 54.3% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.1 (#196)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 33.7 (#201)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1309 | 1185 |
| Omni-MATH | 37.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 58.1% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 35.0 (#189)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 31.2 (#219)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1305 | 1144 |
| MMLU-Pro | 72% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 50% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.2 (#109)
- Qwen1.5-110B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1100 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.0 (#161)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 33.6 (#250)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1323 | 1142 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1339 | 1206 |
| LMArena French | 1347 | 1151 |
| LMArena German | 1306 | 1123 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1301 | 1074 |
| LMArena Korean | 1325 | 1044 |
| LMArena Russian | 1328 | 1118 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1313 | 1142 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.4 (#163)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 60.3 (#252)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1305 | 1158 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 78.3% | — |
| IFEval | 82.4% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#160)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 35.1 (#242)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1320 | 1157 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.7 (#177)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 38.0 (#255)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1330 | 1175 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1148 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1307 | 1160 |
| WildBench | 79% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 34.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better than Qwen1.5-110B?

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.8 to 34.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite or Qwen1.5-110B better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.9 versus 33.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and Qwen1.5-110B share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-110B has 20.