# Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Phi-4

> Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-flash-lite-vs-phi-4
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 24

## Summary

- They share 24 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher in 8 categories and Phi-4 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads 31.8 to 19.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is LiveBench Data Analysis: 65.5% for Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and 45.2% for Phi-4.
- Phi-4 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 30.9 |
| Rank | 189 | 269 |
| Context | — | 128K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.07 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.14 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.4 (#181)
- Phi-4: 33.8 (#237)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 47.1% | 30.7% |
| LMArena Coding | 1322 | 1231 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45.5% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 55.4% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: —
- Phi-4: 22.6 (#120)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 28.8% |
| BALROG | — | 11.6% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 21.2 (#203)
- Phi-4: 17.0 (#287)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 50.1% | 47.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1324 | 1220 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 65.5% | 45.2% |
| LiveBench | 54.3% | 41.6% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 1% |
| DTBench | 52.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 130.43 |
| ForecastBench | 57.1 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.8 (#192)
- Phi-4: 19.6 (#279)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 58.1% | 42% |
| LMArena Math | 1309 | 1246 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 13.8% |
| Omni-MATH | 37.4% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 64.9% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.6 (#185)
- Phi-4: 32.5 (#204)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1305 | 1203 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | 72% | — |
| Confabulations | — | 29.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 3.7% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 50% | — |
| MMLU | — | 84.8% |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 30.6 (#103)
- Phi-4: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1100 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.2 (#156)
- Phi-4: 37.4 (#232)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1323 | 1197 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1339 | 1211 |
| LMArena French | 1346 | 1223 |
| LMArena German | 1306 | 1222 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1302 | 1158 |
| LMArena Korean | 1325 | 1151 |
| LMArena Russian | 1328 | 1209 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1313 | 1234 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.6 (#158)
- Phi-4: 60.6 (#246)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 78.3% | 58.4% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1305 | 1201 |
| IFEval | 82.4% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#155)
- Phi-4: 36.9 (#221)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1321 | 1217 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.9 (#172)
- Phi-4: 40.7 (#239)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1330 | 1217 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1182 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1307 | 1206 |
| LiveBench Language | 34.3% | 25.6% |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 62.6% |
| WildBench | 79% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better than Phi-4?

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite or Phi-4 better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.4 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and Phi-4 share?

24 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 has 37.