# Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Palm 2

> Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.8 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-flash-lite-vs-palm-2
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher in 7 categories and Palm 2 in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads 51.7 to 25.6.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Google |
| Noometry Index | 37.8 | 30.0 |
| Rank | 194 | 298 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.9 (#185)
- Palm 2: 29.0 (#311)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1322 | 994 |
| LiveBench Coding | 47.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 22.0 (#210)
- Palm 2: 19.1 (#271)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1324 | 1005 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 50.1% | — |
| DTBench | 52.5% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 65.5% | — |
| ForecastBench | 57.1 | — |
| LiveBench | 54.3% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.1 (#196)
- Palm 2: 30.8 (#231)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1309 | 1049 |
| Omni-MATH | 37.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 58.1% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 35.0 (#189)
- Palm 2: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 72% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 50% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1305 | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.2 (#109)
- Palm 2: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1100 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.0 (#161)
- Palm 2: 20.9 (#295)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1323 | 916 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1339 | 887 |
| LMArena French | 1347 | — |
| LMArena German | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1301 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1325 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1328 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1313 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.4 (#163)
- Palm 2: 51.0 (#296)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1305 | 1010 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 78.3% | — |
| IFEval | 82.4% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#160)
- Palm 2: 30.8 (#285)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1320 | 1010 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.7 (#177)
- Palm 2: 25.6 (#304)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1330 | 1027 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 991 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1307 | 994 |
| WildBench | 79% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 34.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better than Palm 2?

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.8 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite or Palm 2 better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.9 versus 29.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and Palm 2 share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32 scored results on Noometry and Palm 2 has 10.