# Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Mistral Nemo

> Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-flash-lite-vs-mistral-nemo
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher in 4 categories and Mistral Nemo in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads 51.9 to 28.6.
- Mistral Nemo has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 25.9 |
| Rank | 189 | 332 |
| Context | — | 128K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.15 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.15 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.4 (#181)
- Mistral Nemo: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 47.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1322 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: —
- Mistral Nemo: 23.3 (#118)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 27.6% |
| BALROG | — | 17.6% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 21.2 (#203)
- Mistral Nemo: 19.9 (#230)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 52.5% | 48.6% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 50.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1324 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 65.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 118.63 |
| ForecastBench | 57.1 | — |
| LiveBench | 54.3% | — |
| PIQA | — | 83.5% |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.8 (#192)
- Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#263)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 37.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 58.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1309 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 10.8% |
| GSM8K | — | 84.2% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.6 (#185)
- Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#293)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 29.9% |
| MMLU-Pro | 72% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 50% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1305 | — |
| BoolQ | — | 82.5% |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 30.6 (#103)
- Mistral Nemo: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1100 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.2 (#156)
- Mistral Nemo: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1323 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1339 | — |
| LMArena French | 1346 | — |
| LMArena German | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1302 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1325 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1328 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1313 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.6 (#158)
- Mistral Nemo: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 78.3% | — |
| IFEval | 82.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1305 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#155)
- Mistral Nemo: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1321 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.9 (#172)
- Mistral Nemo: 28.6 (#291)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1330 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 881 |
| WildBench | 79% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1307 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 34.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better than Mistral Nemo?

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and Mistral Nemo share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Nemo has 10.