# Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs MiMo-V2-Pro

> MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-flash-lite-vs-mimo-v2-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Pro in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 62.8 to 51.7.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 37.8 | 43.0 |
| Rank | 194 | 103 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.43 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.87 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.9 (#185)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1322 | 1476 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1433 |
| LiveBench Coding | 47.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.17 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 22.0 (#210)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1324 | 1457 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 25.8% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 45.9% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 50.1% | — |
| DTBench | 52.5% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 65.5% | — |
| ForecastBench | 57.1 | — |
| LiveBench | 54.3% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.1 (#196)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1309 | 1447 |
| Omni-MATH | 37.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 58.1% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 35.0 (#189)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1305 | 1478 |
| MMLU-Pro | 72% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 50% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.2 (#109)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1100 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.0 (#161)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1323 | 1416 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1339 | 1456 |
| LMArena French | 1347 | 1469 |
| LMArena German | 1306 | 1417 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1301 | 1366 |
| LMArena Korean | 1325 | 1400 |
| LMArena Russian | 1328 | 1427 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1313 | 1457 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.4 (#163)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1305 | 1445 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 78.3% | — |
| IFEval | 82.4% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#160)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1320 | 1455 |
| CL-bench | — | 15.7% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 6.9% |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.7 (#177)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1330 | 1436 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1415 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1307 | 1456 |
| WildBench | 79% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 34.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better than MiMo-V2-Pro?

MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite or MiMo-V2-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.8 versus 37.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and MiMo-V2-Pro share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.