# Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Llama 4 Scout

> Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.8 to 27.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-flash-lite-vs-llama-4-scout
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 25

## Summary

- They share 25 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 4 Scout in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads 37.9 to 20.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 52.5% for Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and 57.9% for Llama 4 Scout.
- Llama 4 Scout has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 37.8 | 27.7 |
| Rank | 194 | 330 |
| Context | — | 128K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.10 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.9 (#185)
- Llama 4 Scout: 20.2 (#339)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1322 | 1286 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 9.1% |
| SciCode | — | 17% |
| LiveBench Coding | 47.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 43.1% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: —
- Llama 4 Scout: 24.6 (#119)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 28.1% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 22.0 (#210)
- Llama 4 Scout: 9.1 (#345)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1324 | 1266 |
| DTBench | 52.5% | 57.9% |
| ForecastBench | 57.1 | 57.5 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 36.9% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 0.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 50.1% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 65.5% | — |
| LMCA | — | 12% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 129.64 |
| LiveBench | 54.3% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.1 (#196)
- Llama 4 Scout: 19.6 (#286)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 37.4% | 37.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1309 | 1287 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 7.8% |
| LiveBench Math | 58.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 62.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 0% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 35.0 (#189)
- Llama 4 Scout: 31.9 (#217)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 72% | 74.2% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 50% | 50.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1305 | 1235 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 51.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 7.7% |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.2 (#109)
- Llama 4 Scout: 32.2 (#102)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1100 | 1118 |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 34.2% |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.0 (#161)
- Llama 4 Scout: 41.0 (#212)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1323 | 1252 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1339 | 1255 |
| LMArena French | 1347 | 1282 |
| LMArena German | 1306 | 1272 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1301 | 1206 |
| LMArena Korean | 1325 | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | 1328 | 1263 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1313 | 1278 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.4 (#163)
- Llama 4 Scout: 65.8 (#217)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 82.4% | 81.8% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1305 | 1248 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 78.3% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#160)
- Llama 4 Scout: 27.5 (#294)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1320 | 1265 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 36% |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.7 (#177)
- Llama 4 Scout: 37.0 (#261)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1330 | 1279 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1249 |
| WildBench | 79% | 78% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1307 | 1280 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 783 |
| LiveBench Language | 34.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better than Llama 4 Scout?

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.8 to 27.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite or Llama 4 Scout better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.9 versus 20.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and Llama 4 Scout share?

25 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32 scored results on Noometry and Llama 4 Scout has 43.