# Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Llama 3.2 90B

> Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.8 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-flash-lite-vs-llama-3-2-90b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher in 4 categories and Llama 3.2 90B in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads 34.1 to 11.1.
- Llama 3.2 90B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 37.8 | 27.5 |
| Rank | 194 | 331 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.9 (#185)
- Llama 3.2 90B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 47.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1322 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: —
- Llama 3.2 90B: 30.0 (#80)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 27.3% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 22.0 (#210)
- Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#217)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.4% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 50.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1324 | — |
| DTBench | 52.5% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 65.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 125.5 |
| ForecastBench | 57.1 | — |
| LiveBench | 54.3% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.1 (#196)
- Llama 3.2 90B: 11.1 (#308)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.6% |
| Omni-MATH | 37.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 58.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1309 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 39.4% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 35.0 (#189)
- Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#274)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41% |
| MMLU-Pro | 72% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 50% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1305 | — |
| MMLU | — | 80.3% |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.2 (#109)
- Llama 3.2 90B: 25.4 (#124)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1100 | 1000 |
| GeoBench | — | 52% |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.0 (#161)
- Llama 3.2 90B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1323 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1339 | — |
| LMArena French | 1347 | — |
| LMArena German | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1301 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1325 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1328 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1313 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.4 (#163)
- Llama 3.2 90B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 78.3% | — |
| IFEval | 82.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1305 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#160)
- Llama 3.2 90B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1320 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.7 (#177)
- Llama 3.2 90B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1330 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | — |
| WildBench | 79% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1307 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 34.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better than Llama 3.2 90B?

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.8 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and Llama 3.2 90B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 90B has 9.