# Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Llama 13b

> Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-flash-lite-vs-llama-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 8

## Summary

- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher in 6 categories and Llama 13b in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads 51.9 to 13.9.
- Llama 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 23.9 |
| Rank | 189 | 344 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.4 (#181)
- Llama 13b: 20.9 (#332)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1322 | 683 |
| LiveBench Coding | 47.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 21.2 (#203)
- Llama 13b: 13.4 (#327)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1324 | 728 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 50.1% | — |
| DTBench | 52.5% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 65.5% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 37.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 100.09 |
| ForecastBench | 57.1 | — |
| HellaSwag | — | 79.2% |
| LAMBADA | — | 75.2% |
| LiveBench | 54.3% | — |
| PIQA | — | 80.1% |
| WinoGrande | — | 73% |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.8 (#192)
- Llama 13b: 24.4 (#259)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1309 | 838 |
| Omni-MATH | 37.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 58.1% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 20.6% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.6 (#185)
- Llama 13b: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 72% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 50% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1305 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 52.7% |
| BoolQ | — | 78.7% |
| MMLU | — | 47.7% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 56.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 77.9% |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 30.6 (#103)
- Llama 13b: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1100 | — |
| ScienceQA | — | 43.3% |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.2 (#156)
- Llama 13b: 16.8 (#292)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1323 | 819 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1339 | — |
| LMArena French | 1346 | — |
| LMArena German | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1302 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1325 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1328 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1313 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.6 (#158)
- Llama 13b: 36.9 (#300)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1305 | 781 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 78.3% | — |
| IFEval | 82.4% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#155)
- Llama 13b: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1321 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.9 (#172)
- Llama 13b: 13.9 (#307)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1330 | 834 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 794 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1307 | 753 |
| WildBench | 79% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 34.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better than Llama 13b?

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite or Llama 13b better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.4 versus 20.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and Llama 13b share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32 scored results on Noometry and Llama 13b has 21.