# Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Kimi K2.6

> Kimi K2.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-flash-lite-vs-kimi-k2-6
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 19

## Summary

- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2.6 in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2.6 leads 56.8 to 31.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 52.5% for Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and 90.9% for Kimi K2.6.
- Kimi K2.6 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 47.5 |
| Rank | 189 | 52 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.95 |
| Output $/M | — | $4 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.4 (#181)
- Kimi K2.6: 50.5 (#41)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1322 | 1488 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 76.7% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1509 |
| SciCode | — | 53.5% |
| WeirdML | — | 55.9% |
| LiveBench Coding | 47.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,093 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: —
- Kimi K2.6: 21.8 (#128)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 4.6% |
| ExploitBench | — | 18.4% |
| GBAEval | — | 0.9% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 12% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 6,205 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 21.2 (#203)
- Kimi K2.6: 39.6 (#51)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1324 | 1470 |
| DTBench | 52.5% | 90.9% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 87.2% |
| CritPt | — | 8% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 26% |
| EBR-Bench | — | 2.4% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 50.1% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 18% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 65.5% | — |
| LMCA | — | 37.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 151.03 |
| ForecastBench | 57.1 | — |
| LiveBench | 54.3% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.8 (#192)
- Kimi K2.6: 56.8 (#34)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1309 | 1475 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 57.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 25.6% |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 72.9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 96.1% |
| ProofBench | — | 16% |
| Omni-MATH | 37.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 58.1% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 39% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 14.6% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.6 (#185)
- Kimi K2.6: 53.9 (#48)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1305 | 1491 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 90.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 34.9% |
| MMLU-Pro | 72% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.8% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 50% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 30.6 (#103)
- Kimi K2.6: 31.8 (#95)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1100 | 1282 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 3.9% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 21.7% |
| LMArena Document | — | 1451 |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.2 (#156)
- Kimi K2.6: 55.1 (#35)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1323 | 1446 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1339 | 1521 |
| LMArena French | 1346 | 1471 |
| LMArena German | 1306 | 1449 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1302 | 1442 |
| LMArena Korean | 1325 | 1428 |
| LMArena Russian | 1328 | 1446 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1313 | 1463 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.6 (#158)
- Kimi K2.6: 76.5 (#40)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1305 | 1451 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 78.3% | — |
| IFEval | 82.4% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#155)
- Kimi K2.6: 44.9 (#50)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1321 | 1468 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.9 (#172)
- Kimi K2.6: 68.7 (#25)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1330 | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1434 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1307 | 1453 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1725 |
| WildBench | 79% | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1202 |
| LiveBench Language | 34.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better than Kimi K2.6?

Kimi K2.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite or Kimi K2.6 better for coding?

Kimi K2.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.5 versus 37.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and Kimi K2.6 share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.6 has 51.