# Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Grok 4.3

> Grok 4.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-flash-lite-vs-grok-4-3
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 20

## Summary

- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.3 in 9 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok 4.3 leads 52.5 to 35.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 52.5% for Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and 90.7% for Grok 4.3.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 37.8 | 43.8 |
| Rank | 194 | 86 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $1.25 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.50 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.9 (#185)
- Grok 4.3: 41.6 (#121)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1322 | 1415 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1357 |
| SciCode | — | 47.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 49.9% |
| LiveBench Coding | 47.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 944.17 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: —
- Grok 4.3: 27.7 (#99)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | — | 8% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1165 |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 35.26 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 22.0 (#210)
- Grok 4.3: 35.9 (#68)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1324 | 1396 |
| DTBench | 52.5% | 90.7% |
| ForecastBench | 57.1 | 60.3 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 55.2% |
| CritPt | — | 8% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 25% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 50.1% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 65.5% | — |
| LMCA | — | 38.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 149.16 |
| LiveBench | 54.3% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.1 (#196)
- Grok 4.3: 46.0 (#74)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1309 | 1388 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 42.8% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 14.6% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 93.3% |
| ProofBench | — | 11% |
| Omni-MATH | 37.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 58.1% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 35.0 (#189)
- Grok 4.3: 52.5 (#62)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1305 | 1385 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 88.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 33.2% |
| MMLU-Pro | 72% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 50% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.2 (#109)
- Grok 4.3: 31.6 (#104)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1100 | 1229 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 0% |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.0 (#161)
- Grok 4.3: 50.5 (#120)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1323 | 1385 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1339 | 1422 |
| LMArena French | 1347 | 1412 |
| LMArena German | 1306 | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1301 | 1379 |
| LMArena Korean | 1325 | 1356 |
| LMArena Russian | 1328 | 1399 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1313 | 1398 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.4 (#163)
- Grok 4.3: 72.1 (#140)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1305 | 1366 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 78.3% | — |
| IFEval | 82.4% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#160)
- Grok 4.3: 42.5 (#123)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1320 | 1393 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.7 (#177)
- Grok 4.3: 58.5 (#118)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1330 | 1397 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1380 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1307 | 1406 |
| WildBench | 79% | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1075 |
| LiveBench Language | 34.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better than Grok 4.3?

Grok 4.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite or Grok 4.3 better for coding?

Grok 4.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.6 versus 37.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and Grok 4.3 share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.3 has 40.