# Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Grok 3

> Grok 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-flash-lite-vs-grok-3
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 22

## Summary

- They share 22 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher in 2 categories and Grok 3 in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok 3 leads 46.2 to 35.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA (HELM): 50% for Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and 65% for Grok 3.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 37.8 | 39.9 |
| Rank | 194 | 157 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.9 (#185)
- Grok 3: 41.9 (#115)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1322 | 1432 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 53.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 37.2% |
| LiveBench Coding | 47.1% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: —
- Grok 3: 30.5 (#76)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 29.5% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 22.0 (#210)
- Grok 3: 13.7 (#333)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1324 | 1434 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| SimpleBench | — | 36.1% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 61.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 5.5% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 50.1% | — |
| DTBench | 52.5% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 65.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 138.33 |
| ForecastBench | 57.1 | — |
| LiveBench | 54.3% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.1 (#196)
- Grok 3: 38.0 (#145)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 37.4% | 46.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1309 | 1391 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 55.6% |
| LiveBench Math | 58.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 88.7% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 3.8% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 35.0 (#189)
- Grok 3: 46.2 (#82)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 72% | 78.8% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 50% | 65% |
| LMArena Expert | 1305 | 1421 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 75.8% |
| Confabulations | — | 14.2% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.8% |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.2 (#109)
- Grok 3: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1100 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.0 (#161)
- Grok 3: 52.3 (#87)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1323 | 1410 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1339 | 1448 |
| LMArena French | 1347 | 1460 |
| LMArena German | 1306 | 1431 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1301 | 1387 |
| LMArena Korean | 1325 | 1373 |
| LMArena Russian | 1328 | 1416 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1313 | 1417 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.4 (#163)
- Grok 3: 75.0 (#73)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 82.4% | 88.4% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1305 | 1409 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 78.3% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#160)
- Grok 3: 38.7 (#192)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1320 | 1439 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 58.3% |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.7 (#177)
- Grok 3: 55.8 (#141)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1330 | 1426 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1414 |
| WildBench | 79% | 84.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1307 | 1425 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 76.4% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1186 |
| LiveBench Language | 34.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better than Grok 3?

Grok 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite or Grok 3 better for coding?

Grok 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.9 versus 37.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and Grok 3 share?

22 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32 scored results on Noometry and Grok 3 has 40.