# Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Granite 4.2 30b

> Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-flash-lite-vs-granite-4-2-30b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher in 0 categories and Granite 4.2 30b in 7 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Granite 4.2 30b leads 27.8 to 22.0.
- Granite 4.2 30b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 37.8 | 41.8 |
| Rank | 194 | 130 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.9 (#185)
- Granite 4.2 30b: 41.0 (#126)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1322 | 1396 |
| LiveBench Coding | 47.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 22.0 (#210)
- Granite 4.2 30b: 27.8 (#112)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1324 | 1374 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 50.1% | — |
| DTBench | 52.5% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 65.5% | — |
| ForecastBench | 57.1 | — |
| LiveBench | 54.3% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.1 (#196)
- Granite 4.2 30b: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 37.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 58.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1309 | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 35.0 (#189)
- Granite 4.2 30b: 39.1 (#138)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1305 | 1406 |
| MMLU-Pro | 72% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 50% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.2 (#109)
- Granite 4.2 30b: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1100 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.0 (#161)
- Granite 4.2 30b: 47.3 (#151)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1323 | 1340 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1339 | 1414 |
| LMArena Russian | 1328 | 1343 |
| LMArena French | 1347 | — |
| LMArena German | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1301 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1325 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1313 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.4 (#163)
- Granite 4.2 30b: 71.2 (#155)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1305 | 1347 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 78.3% | — |
| IFEval | 82.4% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#160)
- Granite 4.2 30b: 41.4 (#140)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1320 | 1359 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.7 (#177)
- Granite 4.2 30b: 53.8 (#156)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1330 | 1361 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1288 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1307 | 1339 |
| WildBench | 79% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 34.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better than Granite 4.2 30b?

Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite or Granite 4.2 30b better for coding?

Granite 4.2 30b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.0 versus 37.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and Granite 4.2 30b share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.2 30b has 11.