# Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs GPT-5.2 Pro

> GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.2 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-flash-lite-vs-gpt-5-2-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.2 Pro leads 64.8 to 31.8.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 52.2 |
| Rank | 189 | 34 |
| Context | — | 400K |
| Input $/M | — | $21 |
| Output $/M | — | $168 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.4 (#181)
- GPT-5.2 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 47.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1322 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 21.2 (#203)
- GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.8 (#31)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 54.2% |
| SimpleBench | — | 57.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 79.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 90.5% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 50.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1324 | — |
| DTBench | 52.5% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 65.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 155.41 |
| ForecastBench | 57.1 | — |
| LiveBench | 54.3% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.8 (#192)
- GPT-5.2 Pro: 64.8 (#23)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 74% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 46% |
| Omni-MATH | 37.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 58.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1309 | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 31.3% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.6 (#185)
- GPT-5.2 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 72% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 50% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1305 | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 30.6 (#103)
- GPT-5.2 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1100 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.2 (#156)
- GPT-5.2 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1323 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1339 | — |
| LMArena French | 1346 | — |
| LMArena German | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1302 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1325 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1328 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1313 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.6 (#158)
- GPT-5.2 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 78.3% | — |
| IFEval | 82.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1305 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#155)
- GPT-5.2 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1321 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.9 (#172)
- GPT-5.2 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1330 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | — |
| WildBench | 79% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1307 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 34.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better than GPT-5.2 Pro?

GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.2 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and GPT-5.2 Pro share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.2 Pro has 8.