# Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs GLM-4.7

> GLM-4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.0 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-flash-lite-vs-glm-4-7
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-4.7 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GLM-4.7 leads 47.0 to 35.0.
- GLM-4.7 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 37.8 | 42.0 |
| Rank | 194 | 124 |
| Context | — | 205K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.60 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.9 (#185)
- GLM-4.7: 44.0 (#79)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1322 | 1454 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1435 |
| SciCode | — | 45.1% |
| LiveBench Coding | 47.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 399.48 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: —
- GLM-4.7: 26.5 (#103)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 33.4% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 2,377 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 22.0 (#210)
- GLM-4.7: 24.3 (#164)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1324 | 1443 |
| SimpleBench | — | 47.7% |
| CritPt | — | 1.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 6% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 50.1% | — |
| DTBench | 52.5% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 65.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 143.51 |
| ForecastBench | 57.1 | — |
| LiveBench | 54.3% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.1 (#196)
- GLM-4.7: 38.6 (#135)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1309 | 1423 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 83.3% |
| ProofBench | — | 6% |
| Omni-MATH | 37.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 58.1% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 2.4% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 35.0 (#189)
- GLM-4.7: 47.0 (#80)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1305 | 1424 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 83.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 32.2% |
| MMLU-Pro | 72% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 11.7% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 50% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.2 (#109)
- GLM-4.7: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1100 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.0 (#161)
- GLM-4.7: 52.8 (#79)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1323 | 1417 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1339 | 1495 |
| LMArena French | 1347 | 1432 |
| LMArena German | 1306 | 1424 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1301 | 1439 |
| LMArena Korean | 1325 | 1399 |
| LMArena Russian | 1328 | 1423 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1313 | 1434 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.4 (#163)
- GLM-4.7: 74.4 (#95)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1305 | 1411 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 78.3% | — |
| IFEval | 82.4% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#160)
- GLM-4.7: 42.8 (#116)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1320 | 1432 |
| CL-bench | — | 15.9% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 10.9% |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.7 (#177)
- GLM-4.7: 60.9 (#93)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1330 | 1435 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1401 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1307 | 1446 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1413 |
| WildBench | 79% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 34.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better than GLM-4.7?

GLM-4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.0 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite or GLM-4.7 better for coding?

GLM-4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 37.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and GLM-4.7 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.7 has 36.