# Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs GLM-4.5-Air

> GLM-4.5-Air is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-flash-lite-vs-glm-4-5-air
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 23

## Summary

- They share 23 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher in 3 categories and GLM-4.5-Air in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads 37.9 to 33.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA (HELM): 50% for Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and 59.4% for GLM-4.5-Air.
- GLM-4.5-Air has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 37.8 | 38.9 |
| Rank | 194 | 177 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.20 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.10 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.9 (#185)
- GLM-4.5-Air: 33.3 (#259)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1322 | 1397 |
| GSO | — | 2.9% |
| LiveBench Coding | 47.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 22.0 (#210)
- GLM-4.5-Air: 24.1 (#166)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1324 | 1379 |
| ForecastBench | 57.1 | 59.2 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 43% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 50.1% | — |
| DTBench | 52.5% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 65.5% | — |
| LiveBench | 54.3% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.1 (#196)
- GLM-4.5-Air: 36.2 (#170)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 37.4% | 39.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1309 | 1396 |
| LiveBench Math | 58.1% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 35.0 (#189)
- GLM-4.5-Air: 35.0 (#191)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 72% | 76.2% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 50% | 59.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1305 | 1370 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 8.1% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 9.3% |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.2 (#109)
- GLM-4.5-Air: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1100 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.0 (#161)
- GLM-4.5-Air: 49.1 (#135)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1323 | 1366 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1339 | 1426 |
| LMArena French | 1347 | 1399 |
| LMArena German | 1306 | 1377 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1301 | 1348 |
| LMArena Korean | 1325 | 1308 |
| LMArena Russian | 1328 | 1373 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1313 | 1386 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.4 (#163)
- GLM-4.5-Air: 69.6 (#171)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 82.4% | 81.2% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1305 | 1354 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 78.3% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#160)
- GLM-4.5-Air: 41.6 (#135)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1320 | 1366 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.7 (#177)
- GLM-4.5-Air: 55.9 (#139)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1330 | 1384 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1343 |
| WildBench | 79% | 78.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1307 | 1371 |
| LiveBench Language | 34.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better than GLM-4.5-Air?

GLM-4.5-Air is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite or GLM-4.5-Air better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.9 versus 33.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and GLM-4.5-Air share?

23 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.5-Air has 27.