# Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Gemma 4 26B A4B IT

> Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-flash-lite-vs-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher in 1 category and Gemma 4 26B A4B IT in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads 47.6 to 34.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 52.5% for Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and 74.9% for Gemma 4 26B A4B IT.
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Google |
| Noometry Index | 37.8 | 43.5 |
| Rank | 194 | 92 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.09 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.9 (#185)
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 39.0 (#164)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1322 | 1447 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1359 |
| SciCode | — | 40% |
| WeirdML | — | 35.2% |
| LiveBench Coding | 47.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 927.17 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 22.0 (#210)
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 21.8 (#213)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1324 | 1439 |
| DTBench | 52.5% | 74.9% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 6% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 50.1% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 65.5% | — |
| LMCA | — | 29.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 141.85 |
| ForecastBench | 57.1 | — |
| LiveBench | 54.3% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.1 (#196)
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 47.6 (#67)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1309 | 1470 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 82.2% |
| Omni-MATH | 37.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 58.1% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 35.0 (#189)
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.7 (#85)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1305 | 1447 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 73.2% |
| MMLU-Pro | 72% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.2% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 50% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.2 (#109)
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 40.6 (#46)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1100 | 1260 |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.0 (#161)
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 53.1 (#71)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1323 | 1421 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1339 | 1495 |
| LMArena French | 1347 | 1460 |
| LMArena Russian | 1328 | 1434 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1313 | 1417 |
| LMArena German | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1301 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1325 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.4 (#163)
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 74.8 (#82)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1305 | 1420 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 78.3% | — |
| IFEval | 82.4% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#160)
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 43.6 (#91)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1320 | 1428 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.7 (#177)
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 58.6 (#115)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1330 | 1434 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1402 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1307 | 1441 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1305 |
| WildBench | 79% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 34.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better than Gemma 4 26B A4B IT?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite or Gemma 4 26B A4B IT better for coding?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.0 versus 37.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and Gemma 4 26B A4B IT share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has 28.